Evaluación de pruebas diagnósticas para especialistas en rehabilitación cardiopulmonar
Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for Professionals who Perform Cardiopulmonary Rehabilitation
Barra lateral del artículo
PDF
FLIP
XML
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial 4.0.
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Introducción: A diario, los profesionales de la salud se enfrentan a importantes retos diagnósticos cuando atienden a sus pacientes, por lo que se apoyan en exámenes paraclínicos que complementan su ejercicio semiológico, porque les permiten confirmar o descartar una enfermedad. Objetivo: Explicar a los especialistas en rehabilitación cardiopulmonar los conceptos requeridos para interpretar de forma crítica los resultados de las pruebas diagnósticas. Materiales y métodos: Revisión narrativa de la literatura, que expone conceptos actualizados, ejemplos y gráficas con enfoque académico y didáctico. Resultado: Se realizó la actualización y explicación de los conceptos de sensibilidad, especificidad, valores predictivos positivo y negativo y los likelihood ratio positivo y negativo y su interpretación en el normograma de Fagan, a través de ejemplos del día a día del especialista. Conclusión: Comprender los conceptos que acompañan la evaluación de pruebas diagnósticas ayuda a que los especialistas en rehabilitación cardiopulmonar analicen críticamente los resultados de las ayudas paraclínicas funcionales y estructurales que acompañan a sus pacientes y, de esta manera, puedan caracterizar bien el diagnóstico y seguimiento de las personas.
Palabras clave:
Descargas
Detalles del artículo
Referencias (VER)
Leeflang MMG, Allerberger F. How to: evaluate a diagnostic test. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2019 Jan;25(1):54-59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.011 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmi.2018.06.011
Leeflang MM, Deeks JJ, Gatsonis C, Bossuyt PM; Cochrane Diagnostic Test Accuracy Working Group. Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy. Ann Intern Med. 2008 Dec 16;149(12):889-97. https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.7326/0003-4819-149-12-200812160-00008
Sitch AJ, Dekkers OM, Scholefield BR, Takwoingi Y. Introduction to diagnostic test accuracy studies. Eur J Endocrinol. 2021 Feb;184(2):E5-E9. https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1239 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1530/EJE-20-1239
Gogtay NJ, Thatte UM. Statistical Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests (Part 1): Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Values. J Assoc Physicians India. 2017 Jun;65(6):80-84.
Maxim LD, Niebo R, Utell MJ. Screening tests: a review with examples. Inhal Toxicol. 2014 Nov;26(13):811-28. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2014.955932. Epub 2014 Sep 29. Erratum in: Inhal Toxicol. 2019 Jun;31(7):298. https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2014.955932 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/08958378.2014.955932
Epidemiology and Global Health. Vol 4, Issue 2, 2016, Pages 76-79, ISSN 2213-3984. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2015.12.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cegh.2015.12.001
Medina M. C, Generalidades de las pruebas diagnósticas, y su utilidad en la toma de decisiones médicas. Revista Colombiana de Psiquiatría. 2011;40(4):787-797. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60165-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0034-7450(14)60165-7
Swift A, Heale R, Twycross A. What are sensitivity and specificity? Evid Based Nurs. 2020 Jan;23(1):2-4. doi: 10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103225. Epub 2019 Nov 12. Erratum in: Evid Based Nurs. 2022 Apr;25(2):e1. https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103225 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/ebnurs-2019-103225
Salech Felipe, Mery Victoria, Larrondo Francisco, Rada Gabriel. Estudios que evalúan un test diagnóstico: interpretando sus resultados. Rev. méd. Chile [Internet]. 2008 Sep [citado 2023 Feb 22] ; 136( 9 ): 1208-1208. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872008000900018 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4067/S0034-98872008000900018
Simundic AM. Diagnostic accuracy-Part 1 Basic concepts: sensitivity and specificity, ROC analysis, STARD statement. 2009. Recuperado en: https://acutecaretesting.org/-/media/acutecaretesting/files/pdf/diagnostic-accuracy--part-1-basic-concepts--sensitivity-and-specificity-roc-analysis-stard-statement.pdf
Singhvi D, Bon J. CT Imaging and Comorbidities in COPD: Beyond Lung Cancer Screening. Chest. 2021 Jan;159(1):147-153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2053 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chest.2020.08.2053
Jens T. Bakker, Karin Klooster, Rozemarijn Vliegenthart, Dirk-Jan Slebos. Measuring pulmonary function in COPD using quantitative chest computed tomography analysis. European Respiratory Review Sep 2021, 30 (161) 210031. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0031-2021 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0031-2021
Elena Schnieders, Elyesa Ünal, Volker Winkler, Peter Dambach, Valérie R. Louis, Olaf Horstick, Florian Neuhann, Andreas Deckert. Performance of alternative COPD case-finding tools: a systematic review and meta-analysis. European Respiratory Review Jun 2021, 30 (160) 200350. https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0350-2020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1183/16000617.0350-2020
Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease - GOLD. GLOBAL STRATEGY FOR PREVENTION, DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF COPD: 2022 Report. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease - GOLD [Internet]. 2022 Jan 24 [cited 2022 Jun 13];1(1):1-56. https://goldcopd.org/2022-gold-reports-2/
Christenson SA, Smith BM, Bafadhel M, Putcha N. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Vol. 399, The Lancet. 2022. Elsevier B.V.; 2022. p. 2227. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00470-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(22)00470-6
D'Urzo KA, Mok F, D'Urzo AD. Variation Among Spirometry Interpretation Algorithms. Respir Care. 2020 Oct;65(10):1585-1590. https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07294 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4187/respcare.07294
Hoesterey D, Das N, Janssens W, Buhr RG, Martinez FJ, Cooper CB, Tashkin DP, Barjaktarevic I. Spirometric indices of early airflow impairment in individuals at risk of developing COPD: Spirometry beyond FEV1/FVC. Respir Med. 2019 Sep;156:58-68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.08.004 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rmed.2019.08.004
Kesmodel US. Cross-sectional studies - what are they good for? Vol. 97, Acta Obstetricia et Gynecologica Scandinavica. Wiley-Blackwell; 2018. p. 388-93. https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13331 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.13331
Cataldo R, Arancibia M, Stojanova J, Papuzinski C. General concepts in biostatistics and clinical epidemiology: Observational studies with cross-sectional and ecological designs. Medwave. 2019 Sep 25;19(8):e7698. https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2019.08.7698 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5867/medwave.2019.08.7698
Buka SL, Rosenthal SR, Lacy ME. Epidemiological Study Designs: Traditional and Novel Approaches to Advance Life Course Health Development Research. 2017 Nov 21. In: Halfon N, Forrest CB, Lerner RM, et al., editors. Handbook of Life Course Health Development [Internet]. Cham (CH): Springer; 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_22 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-47143-3_22
Campbell JM, Klugar M, Ding S, Carmody DP, Hakonsen SJ, Jadotte YT, White S, Munn Z. Diagnostic test accuracy: methods for systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Evid Based Healthc. 2015 Sep;13(3):154-62. https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000061 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/XEB.0000000000000061
Korevaar, D.A., Gopalakrishna, G., Cohen, J.F. et al. Targeted test evaluation: a framework for designing diagnostic accuracy studies with clear study hypotheses. Diagn Progn Res 3, 22 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0069-2 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41512-019-0069-2
Heuer C, Stevenson MA. Diagnostic test validation studies when there is a perfect reference standard. Rev Sci Tech. 2021 Jun;40(1):261-270. https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.40.1.3223 DOI: https://doi.org/10.20506/rst.40.1.3223
Mouliou DS, Gourgoulianis KI. False-positive and false-negative COVID-19 cases: respiratory prevention and management strategies, vaccination, and further perspectives. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2021 Aug;15(8):993-1002. https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2021.1917389 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17476348.2021.1917389
Aamir, A., Hamilton, R.G. (2014). Predictive Value Model for Laboratory Tests: Diagnostic Sensitivity, Diagnostic Specificity, Positive and Negative Predictive Value, Efficiency, Likelihood Ratio ([positive and negative]), Incidence and Prevalence. In: Mackay, I.R., Rose, N.R., Ledford, D.K., Lockey, R.F. (eds) Encyclopedia of Medical Immunology. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9194-1_312 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-9194-1_312
Monaghan TF, Rahman SN, Agudelo CW, Wein AJ, Lazar JM, Everaert K, Dmochowski RR. Foundational Statistical Principles in Medical Research: Sensitivity, Specificity, Positive Predictive Value, and Negative Predictive Value. Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 May 16;57(5):503. https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050503 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050503
Leeflang MM, Rutjes AW, Reitsma JB, Hooft L, Bossuyt PM. Variation of a test's sensitivity and specificity with disease prevalence. CMAJ. 2013 Aug 6;185(11):E537-44. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121286 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.121286
Ying GS, Maguire MG, Glynn RJ, Rosner B. Calculating Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values for Correlated Eye Data. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2020 Sep 1;61(11):29. https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.11.29 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1167/iovs.61.11.29
Staffa SJ, Zurakowski D. Statistical evaluation of diagnostic tests: A primer for pediatric surgeons. J Pediatr Surg. 2019 Apr;54(4):799-804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.010 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2018.06.010
Trevethan R. Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values: Foundations, Pliabilities, and Pitfalls in Research and Practice. Front Public Health. 2017 Nov 20;5:307. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00307 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2017.00307
Kotowski M, Szydlowski J. Radiological diagnostics in nasal dermoids: Pitfalls, predictive values and literature analysis. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol. 2021 Oct;149:110842. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110842 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijporl.2021.110842
Vali Y, Yang B, Olsen M, Leeflang MMG, Bossuyt PMM. Reporting of test comparisons in diagnostic accuracy studies: A literature review. Res Synth Methods. 2021 May;12(3):357-367. https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1469 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1469
Shreffler J, Huecker MR. Diagnostic Testing Accuracy: Sensitivity, Specificity, Predictive Values and Likelihood Ratios. 2022 Mar 9. In: StatPearls [Internet]. Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls Publishing; 2022 Jan.
Baratloo A, Safari S, Elfil M, Negida A. Evidence Based Emergency Medicine Part 3: Positive and Negative Likelihood Ratios of Diagnostic Tests. Emerg (Tehran). 2015;3(4):170-1.
Fierz W. Likelihood ratios of quantitative laboratory results in medical diagnosis: The application of Bézier curves in ROC analysis. PLoS One. 2018 Feb 22;13(2):e0192420. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192420 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0192420
McGinn T, Jervis R, Wisnivesky J, Keitz S, Wyer PC; Evidence-based Medicine Teaching Tips Working Group. Tips for teachers of evidence-based medicine: clinical prediction rules (CPRs) and estimating pretest probability. J Gen Intern Med. 2008 Aug;23(8):1261-8. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0623-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-008-0623-z
Parikh R, Parikh S, Arun E, Thomas R. Likelihood ratios: clinical application in day-to-day practice. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2009 May-Jun;57(3):217-21. https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.49397 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.49397
Fierz W, Bossuyt X. Likelihood Ratio Approach and Clinical Interpretation of Laboratory Tests. Front Immunol. 2021 Apr 16;12:655262. https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.655262 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fimmu.2021.655262
Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005 Apr 23-29;365(9469):1500-5. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66422-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(05)66422-7
Silva Fuente-Alba C, Molina Villagra M. Likelihood ratio (razón de verosimilitud): definición y aplicación en Radiología. Rev. argent. radiol. [Internet]. 2017 Sep [citado 2023 Feb 22] ; 81( 3 ): 204-208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rard.2016.11.002 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rard.2016.11.002
Akobeng AK. Understanding diagnostic tests 2: likelihood ratios, pre- and post-test probabilities and their use in clinical practice. Acta Paediatr. 2007 Apr;96(4):487-91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00179.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1651-2227.2006.00179.x
Weatherall M. Information provided by diagnostic and screening tests: improving probabilities. Postgrad Med J. 2018 Apr;94(1110):230-235. https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135273 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/postgradmedj-2017-135273
Habibzadeh F, Habibzadeh P. The likelihood ratio and its graphical representation. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2019 Jun 15;29(2):020101. https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.020101 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11613/BM.2019.020101
Uy EJB. Key concepts in clinical epidemiology: Estimating pre-test probability. J Clin Epidemiol. 2022 Apr;144:198-202. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.022 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2021.10.022
van Norman ER, Klingbeil DA, Nelson PM. Posttest probabilities: An empirical demonstration of their use in evaluating the performance of universal screening measures across settings. School Psychology Review. 2017 Dec 1;46(4):349-62. https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0046.V46-4 DOI: https://doi.org/10.17105/SPR-2017-0046.V46-4
Fagan TJ. Letter: Nomogram for Bayes theorem. N Engl J Med. 1975 Jul 31;293(5):257. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197507312930513 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJM197507312930513
Abushouk AI. Evolution of Fagan's Nomogram; a Commentary. Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Summer;4(3):114-5.
Caraguel CG, Vanderstichel R. The two-step Fagan's nomogram: ad hoc interpretation of a diagnostic test result without calculation. Evid Based Med. 2013 Aug;18(4):125-8. https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101243 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1136/eb-2013-101243
Safari S, Baratloo A, Elfil M, Negida A. Evidence Based Emergency Medicine; Part 4: Pre-test and Post-test Probabilities and Fagan's nomogram. Emerg (Tehran). 2016 Winter;4(1):48-51.
Ma Z, Chong HY, Liao PC. Real-time safety inspection and planning: A first application of the fagan nomogram. Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering. 2020;47(4):438-49. https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0500 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1139/cjce-2018-0500
Huang, J., Liu, M., He, W. et al. Use of the A2DS2 scale to predict morbidity in stroke-associated pneumonia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Neurol 21, 33 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02060-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12883-021-02060-8
Citado por
